SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Necessary or Sufficient? Evaluating LLM Explanations With Behavioural Evidence
LLM decision components that can operate within agent workflows often produce action-relevant recommendations or judgements together with explanations. Operators may use the named factors to monitor a system, diagnose errors, or decide when to escalate an output. Such use assumes that the explanations agree with the component's observable decision behaviour. We test two interpretations of the named factors: necessity, meaning that changing a factor would change the output, and sufficiency, meaning that retaining it while removing other changeable information would preserve the output. We evalu
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-04T17:37:17.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-20T21:52:07.471Z. This is not the publication date.