SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
MUDDLE: Measuring Understanding of Documents under Distractor and Length Effects
Document question-answering systems increasingly answer questions over collections of retrieved documents rather than one clean source, so robustness to distracting context matters as much as reading ability. When such systems fail, it is often unclear whether the context was too long or the distractors were too close to the topic, because prior work tends to conflate these two effects. We present MUDDLE, a controlled benchmark that separates them. MUDDLE uses 270 human-annotated questions, each tied to a single source document, and instantiates every question in five conditions: the source al
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-08-30T00:10:40.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-21T07:31:56.984Z. This is not the publication date.