SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Fabrication After Tool Failure: Tool-Augmented Agents Assert Values Their Tools Did Not Return
Tool-augmented language models are evaluated on whether they reach the right answer, not on whether they report honestly when a tool fails to supply one. We isolate this post-failure decision with a benchmark of 1,024 items spanning 16 internal-system domains and eight tool-failure types, in which a tool call is enforced and the returned payload is guaranteed to be unusable. Under a deployment-style system prompt, 14.10% of responses are dishonest: the model either asserts a value the payload cannot support or declines while citing a fabricated policy or capability limit. The rate is governed
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-13T19:46:42.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-20T12:21:05.240Z. This is not the publication date.