SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Beyond Scores: Understanding LLM-as-a-Judge Mechanisms in Summarization Evaluation
LLM-based evaluators of natural language generation (NLG) quality are widely deployed as scoring tools and as automated training signals, yet the internal procedure by which they assign a rating remains poorly understood. We investigate this procedure mechanistically through an eight-attack perturbation taxonomy across the Readability and Adequacy dimensions of NLG quality, a generation pipeline that produces paired clean and corrupt summaries with controlled error intensity and explicit token-level modification maps, and a four-experiment battery of causal tracing, logit-lens vocabulary proje
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-01T17:59:49.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-21T06:01:56.170Z. This is not the publication date.