SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Where Do Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders Fail on Low-Resource Languages?
Recent multilingual vision--language encoders cover hundreds of languages in a single model, yet on two state-of-the-art instances retrieval on low-resource languages (LRL; e.g. Swahili) trails high-resource ones (HRL; e.g. English) by $30^+$\,pp. We ask where in the trained encoder this gap is located. Prior modality-gap and cross-lingual subspace work suggests a linear language direction at the output crowds out alignment-relevant geometry. We falsify this: LEACE drives the linear language classifier from $>99\%$ to near chance and iterated INLP to $37$--$50\%$ while LRL retrieval moves with
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-08-31T12:59:35.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-21T07:01:58.596Z. This is not the publication date.