SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Evolution or Illusion? Rethinking Evaluation in LLM Evolutionary Search
LLM-driven evolutionary search finds programs by launching seeds and iterating each one. Papers report a single budget setting, usually one seed run for a fixed number of iterations, and rank methods from that one point. We show this is not enough. We evaluate three evolutionary search strategies on five optimization tasks, commonly used by papers in the genre to report results. We run the analysis over a full grid of seeds and iterations. Our findings suggest that the best way to split a fixed budget between more seeds (width) and more iterations (depth) changes with the strategy, the task, a
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-17T07:12:42.000Z
- arXiv · Artificial Intelligence · 2026-09-17T07:12:42.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-19T20:26:32.566Z. This is not the publication date.