SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
FaithSieve: Fine-Grained Evaluation of Math Proofs with Faithful Formal Evidence
Large language models can now generate complex, multi-step mathematical proofs, but reliably determining their correctness and localizing early logical errors remains a critical challenge. Existing evaluation approaches largely depend on model-based natural-language judgments, which often overlook local reasoning gaps. While formal theorem provers like Lean offer a path to rigorous verification, using them to evaluate informal text requires solving locality and semantic mismatches: a prover might bypass a local flaw by proving an overly broad target, or validate an auto-formalized statement th
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-08-26T18:43:30.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-21T09:11:58.312Z. This is not the publication date.