SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
When Do Internal Probes Beat Reading the Answer? Miscalibrated Readouts and Behavior-Concealed Knowledge in Language Models
A 0.6B language model, asked to verify 1,200 logical conclusions (half valid, half corrupted by a single semantic edit), answers YES every time. Judged by behavior it discriminates nothing; linear probes on its hidden states read the correct verdict at 0.96 AUC, transferring to unseen logical structures and separating foils built from exactly the words of the true conclusion (0.90). We ask where the verdict is lost, and find the dominant failure is a single scalar. The verdict survives to the model's own output logits (margin AUC 0.89) along a well-aligned readout direction; a saturated decisi
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-04T00:26:45.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-21T04:31:57.454Z. This is not the publication date.