SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Wrong Prediction, Right Answer: Recovering Evidence from Collapsed LLM Sequence Scores
When a large language model fails a reasoning task, it is often assumed to lack the underlying capability. However, this conflates a genuine absence of reasoning with a late-stage output bottleneck. We observe a consistent readout gap across diverse reasoning benchmarks: hidden-state probes successfully decode correct answers even when native sequence scoring completely collapses due to structural biases. To test whether instance-specific logic survives this collapse, we introduce a diagnostic protocol using a minimal, target-label-free additive correction. Fitting just two parameters on as fe
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-08-31T16:43:55.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-21T06:41:57.136Z. This is not the publication date.