SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
The Unreliable Progress Bar: Can LLM Agents Reliably Report Task Progress Throughout Execution?
Recent large language models can emit task-progress signals that agent frameworks use to decide whether a task should continue or stop, yet whether a model can reliably report its task progress at every stage of a task, and where and how its reports fail, has not been studied systematically. We evaluate this ability on the public benchmark $τ^2$-bench and on StageIF, a controlled testbed in which reporting checkpoints are placed across the task's lifecycle. Both settings require reports at multiple task stages. We find that reporting reliability depends on the stage a task has reached, and tha
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-08T11:25:31.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-20T20:02:11.508Z. This is not the publication date.