AIIC AI Intelligence Centre

SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE

Quantifying Overclaiming Propensity in Frontier LLM Agents

arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · article · Sep 17, 2026 · UTC

Frontier coding agents are increasingly trusted to work autonomously for long periods of time, yet what they actually did is often hard to tell from their final response. We quantify the propensity of such agents to overclaim task completion, which may mislead the user. We operationalize overclaiming as a final response that reports work that the agent's own transcript shows it did not do, for example, claiming to have read a file it never opened. This criterion requires no inference about intent and does not depend on whether the delivered work is correct; it asks only whether the reported wo

Read original source ↗ Open in workspace

recordType
paper
region
Global

Evidence & attribution

First collected: 2026-09-19T20:26:32.566Z. This is not the publication date.

Observed changes

AIIC observation times, not verified publisher revision times. Up to eight recent revisions.

2026-09-23T14:12:08.350Z

  • summary: Frontier coding agents are increasingly trusted to work autonomously for long periods, yet an agent's final response is often the only account of that work a user sees. We quantify the propensity of frontier agents to \emph{overclaim} task completion, a misrepresentation that can mislead the user. An agent overclaims when its final response contradicts information in its context. This definition requires no inference about intent and is independent of task success. We introduce \emph{OverclaimBench}, an evaluation suite composed of five file-review scenarios, transcript-based coverage measuremFrontier coding agents are increasingly trusted to work autonomously for long periods of time, yet what they actually did is often hard to tell from their final response. We quantify the propensity of such agents to overclaim task completion, which may mislead the user. We operationalize overclaiming as a final response that reports work that the agent's own transcript shows it did not do, for example, claiming to have read a file it never opened. This criterion requires no inference about intent and does not depend on whether the delivered work is correct; it asks only whether the reported wo