SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Editorial routing shapes how computational results are qualified in AI-assisted scientific writing
Large language models increasingly analyze computational results and draft manuscripts, making reliable communication as important as correct analysis. Using fixed computational evidence, we tested whether assigning comparisons across modeling choices elsewhere in a research workflow changes manuscript reporting. In constrained sentence-writing tasks, Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5 often omitted numerical qualifications when detailed comparisons were assigned to a group repository, but retained them more often when the same comparison was assigned to Supporting Information or its own working note
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-13T05:15:56.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-20T12:41:04.663Z. This is not the publication date.